Case for War: In Defense of Freedom Preview 1 of 7

Uploaded by: disturbinglyyellow
Video Description:
Former Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle travels the globe articulating, defending and debating the neoconservative case for an assertive American foreign policy. Perle finds no shortage of candidates willing to challenge him on these issues.

Tags for this video: 9/11 911 Afghanistan Iraq Neocon Neoconservative Perl Qaeda Richard Taliban Terror Terrorism War

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by disturbinglyyellow

Related Videos

Neo-Con Philosophy - Part One	Case For War	Case for War: In Defense of Freedom Preview 4 of 7

Bill Maher thinks we should be able to wish Cheney dead	(1of6) A 16 Year Old Iranian Girl Executed by Islamic Police	Coffee with Richard Perle

Share This Video:

Comments for this video: Show || Hide

Comments for this video on YouTube

"We would be ... ( 1 year ago by burningbridges412)

"We would be entirely justified if no one in the world supported us" Mission accomplished you stupid fuck.

Thank you for ... ( 1 year ago by jshabadoo)

Thank you for posting this -- great piece!!!!

Are the people our ... ( 1 year ago by gary870)

Are the people our troops killing in the middle east good people or bad people? If they are good that makes our troops and commanders ignorant and murderers. Are they?NO!

If Perle's central ... ( 1 year ago by tchicherine)

If Perle's central reason for going into Iraq was "to remove Saddam Hussein", he was very much out of step with the rest of the administration. Bush repeatedly stated immediately before the war that even if Saddam and his family left the country the US was still going to invade.

terrorism is " ... ( 1 year ago by thisjackis)

terrorism is "killing innocent people for political reasons", no matter who does it. What is done by a suicide bomber is called terrorism as much as what is done with sophisticated aircrafts and laser-guided bombs.

hopkins reported ... ( 1 year ago by rOaCh2000)

hopkins reported that 600,000 people died in iraq and that 30% of the deaths have been caused by the coalition. 49% by foreign al qaida operatives(who wouldn't be there if america didn't invade) and the other 21% by the iraqi army police and the shia government. what a good idea invading iraq was. why don't you go over there and tell the people who mourn at a mass grave what a good idea invading iraq was

opposing Richard ... ( 1 year ago by custerdivision)

opposing Richard Perle and real intellectuals with ridiculous hippies and extreme leftist idiots. What a joke.

If you don't ... ( 1 year ago by ChuckManiac)

If you don't support the war, then why do you join the military? Son, you are in the your profession, be a lawyer or a doctor instead. Leave the wars to the patriots and soldiers.

I hate how mothers ... ( 1 year ago by TacticusPrime)

I hate how mothers call their grown sons children just because they may be their progeny. We have a VOLUNTEER military entirely composed of adults. Those are MEN and WOMEN who serve the country in Iraq and they knew what they were signing up for. Doesn't mean the occupation wasn't a TERRIBLE idea, but it does mean we should avoid introducing emotion into the issue. We all feel bad for them, that's not the point.

I hope u root in ... ( 1 year ago by CharlesUSA)

I hope u root in hell richard perle, u are responsible for 3000 and more American troops dead

Listen to the man ... ( 1 year ago by jshabadoo)

Listen to the man instead of writing things you have no idea what your talking about. You people make me sick and you shame the memory of our troops. Mr. Perle is a good man, you should read some of his work.

i found this to be ... ( 10 months ago by llapole)

i found this to be a fair piece. well done.

We need to mobilize ... ( 10 months ago by KenMacMillan)

We need to mobilize for total war. When Hitler tried to conquer the world we stopped him. Now we're faced with a threat that's just as big & nobody seems to notice. WTF America, it's time to fight! We can save American lives with real war instead of pussyfooting around waiting to get blown up.

I agree, of coarse ... ( 10 months ago by KenMacMillan)

I agree, of coarse they're sad their sons died but at least they died defending freedom. Protesting won't bring them back & if they knew how serious the problem really is then they would be on the streets proclaiming their sons & daughters bravery. They would be right to do so too.

The difference ... ( 10 months ago by MrPotatoesLatkie)

The difference between Germany and, the radical Islamists is that Germany was a modern industrial and, military (albiet regional) power. The threat from the Islamists is not the same. They could only plant explosives and, hijack planes to attack us. Hardly the same threat.

The Islamists do ... ( 8 months ago by leoca)

The Islamists do not need to be modern and industrial. They just need a country with resources. This is what the Nazi did with Germany. The Islamists have plenty of option. Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, UAE, Egypt, Libya, and their goal, Europe.

While many of those ... ( 8 months ago by MrPotatoesLatkie)

While many of those countries have great resources, they lack the technology to produce a strong, conventional force, capable of doing what the Germans did. Most also don't have the population of willing soldiers, nor the organization to train what they have to make a formidible conventional force.
They also won't have Europe, since the outcome of the forthcoming Muslim population growth will lead to societal upheaval, or a secularization of the Muslims.

Islamists will ... ( 8 months ago by leoca)

Islamists will never be able to control powerful countries and Europe.
America won't allow it.

THERE IS NO EXIT ... ( 7 months ago by danger0usknowledge)

THERE IS NO EXIT STRATEGY. There were
mistakes, just not the mistakes you
were told about. Just enough troops were
committed to lose which also guaranteed
that WE HAD TO STAY & cause enough
chaos to get the oil & surround Iran.
Now, AS IF BY MAGIC, & just in time for
the US elections, we are losing less men.
Do you think it just happened that way?
The "mistakes" were deliberate, all of
them were planned. Pearl is a double
agent and proud of it. Pearl; "that's
right, I don't care".

I agree this war ... ( 7 months ago by macadomus)

I agree this war was about oil and money. It was a win win sitution as long as were there defense contractor will make money. Oil is now a something to invest in since it $4. Fuck this guy and his gang. They hijacked this country power and riches to fight there battles fuck me fuck you and fuck america if I ever met this guy in person i would split in his face.

What a crock of ... ( 6 months ago by aboveyourhead)

What a crock of shit!

We have an exit ... ( 2 months ago by thekingofcorsairs)

We have an exit strategy: Victory!

They died defending ... ( 2 months ago by chillende)

They died defending freedom? Please stop saying that shit! PLEASE?! There is too much information out here for you to write that garbage...
I'm glad you at least have sympathy for the parents, but your lack of presence of mind will surely lead to further loss of life and you sentiments will do none of these people (or future families) any good.
To quote Senator Mike Gravel: "They died for nothing. NOTHING."
Try allowing them to live.

I'm an american ... ( 2 months ago by chillende)

I'm an american living abroad whose viewpoint (when a part of a collective voice) has ample effect on what the president decides for the military. The invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with terrorism (but it sure does now). We can't invade countries and kill their citizens and not expect a percentage of them to fight back. Were it us whose countries sovereignty were infringed upon, many of us would do just that... fight back. As we should.
They're fellow human beings. They deserve respect.

Tell a friend:

Wargames Forum

Videos de batallas

Case for War: In Defense of Freedom Preview 1 of 7

URL
Embed Code